Vous consultez actuellement le site Web destiné aux clients institutionnels du Canada. Vous pouvez modifier votre lieu de résidence ici ou visiter d’autres sites Web de RBC GMA.

Bienvenue sur le site institutionnel ph & n pour les investisseurs institutionnels
English

Pour accéder au site, veuillez accepter nos conditions générales.

Veuillez lire les conditions générales suivantes attentivement. En accédant aux sites rbcgma.com et à toute autre page de ceux-ci (le « site »), vous acceptez d'être lié par ces conditions ainsi que par toute modification que pourrait apporter RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs Inc. (« RBC GMA Inc. ») à sa discrétion. Si vous n'acceptez pas les conditions générales figurant ci-dessous, n'accédez pas à ce site Web ou à toute page de celui-ci. Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements est une division de RBC GMA Inc.

Aucune offre

PLes produits et les services de RBC GMA Inc. ne sont offerts que dans les territoires de compétence au sein desquels ils peuvent être vendus légalement. Le contenu de ce site Web ne représente pas une offre de vente ni une sollicitation d'achat de produits ou de services auprès de toute personne dans un territoire de compétence au sein duquel une telle offre ou sollicitation est considérée comme illégale.

Aucun renseignement figurant sur ce site Web ne doit être interprété comme un conseil en matière de placement ni comme une recommandation ou une représentation de la pertinence ou du caractère approprié de tout produit ou service. L'ampleur du risque associé à un placement particulier dépend largement de la situation personnelle de l'investisseur.

Aucune utilisation

Le matériel figurant sur ce site a été fourni par RBC GMA Inc. à titre d'information uniquement ; il ne peut être reproduit, distribué ou publié sans le consentement écrit de RBC GMA Inc. Ce matériel ne sert qu'à fournir de l'information générale et ne constitue ni ne prétend être une description complète des solutions d'investissement et des stratégies offertes par RBC GMA Inc., y compris les fonds RBC, les portefeuilles privés RBC, les fonds PH&N, les fonds de catégorie de société RBC ainsi que les FNB RBC (les « fonds »). En cas de divergence entre ce document et les notices d'offre respectives, les dispositions des notices d'offre prévaudront.

RBC GMA Inc. prend des mesures raisonnables pour fournir des renseignements exacts, fiables et à jour, et les croit ainsi au moment de les publier. Les renseignements obtenus auprès de tiers sont jugés uniquement ; toutefois, aucune déclaration ni garantie, expresse ou implicite, n'est faite par RBC GMA Inc., ses sociétés affiliées ou toute autre personne quant à leur exactitude, leur intégralité ou leur bien-fondé. RBC GMA Inc. n'assume aucune responsabilité pour de telles erreurs ou des omissions. Les points de vue et les opinions exprimés sur le présent site Web sont ceux de RBC GMA Inc. et peuvent changer sans préavis.

À propos de nos fonds

Les fonds de RBC GMA Inc. sont distribués par l'entremise de courtiers autorisés. Les investissements dans les fonds peuvent comporter le paiement de commissions, de commissions de suivi, de frais et de dépenses de gestion. Veuillez lire la notice d'offre propre à chaque fonds avant d'investir. Les données sur le rendement fournies sont des rendements historiques et ne reflètent en aucun cas les valeurs futures des fonds ou des rendements sur les placements des fonds. Par ailleurs, les données sur le rendement fournies tiennent compte seulement du réinvestissement des distributions et ne tiennent pas compte des frais d'achat, de rachat, de distribution ou des frais optionnels ni des impôts à payer par tout porteur de parts qui auraient pour effet de réduire le rendement. Les valeurs unitaires des fonds autres que ceux de marché monétaire varient fréquemment. Il n'y a aucune garantie que les fonds de marché monétaire seront en mesure de maintenir leur valeur liquidative par part à un niveau constant ou que vous récupérerez le montant intégral de votre placement dans le fonds. Les titres de fonds communs de placement ne sont pas garantis par la Société d'assurance-dépôts du Canada ni par aucun autre organisme gouvernemental d'assurance-dépôts. Les rendements antérieurs peuvent ne pas se répéter. Les parts de FNB sont achetées et vendues au prix du marché en bourse et les commissions de courtage réduiront les rendements. Les FNB RBC ne cherchent pas à produire un rendement d'un montant prédéterminé à la date d'échéance. Les rendements de l'indice ne représentent pas les rendements des FNB RBC.

À propos de RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs

RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe les sociétés affiliées suivantes situées partout dans le monde, toutes étant des filiales indirectes de RBC : RBC GMA Inc. (y compris Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements et PH&N Institutionnel), RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, RBC Investment Management (Asia) Limited, BlueBay Asset Management LLP, and BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC.

Déclarations prospectives

Ce document peut contenir des déclarations prospectives à l'égard des facteurs économiques en général qui ne garantissent pas le rendement futur. Les déclarations prospectives comportent des incertitudes et des risques inhérents, et donc les prédictions, prévisions, projections et autres déclarations prospectives pourraient ne pas se réaliser. Nous vous recommandons de ne pas vous fier indûment à ces déclarations, puisqu'un certain nombre de facteurs importants pourraient faire en sorte que les événements ou les résultats réels diffèrent considérablement de ceux qui sont mentionnés, explicitement ou implicitement, dans une déclaration prospective. Toutes les opinions contenues dans les déclarations prospectives peuvent être modifiées sans préavis et sont fournies de bonne foi, mais sans responsabilité légale.

Accepter Déclin
org.apache.velocity.tools.view.context.ChainedContext@77624afa
Par  Eric Lascelles 21 juillet 2023

Le ralentissement est le mot d’ordre dans de nombreux pans de l’économie. Notre économiste en chef passe en revue les dernières données économiques, notamment sur l’inflation, l’emploi et les dépenses de consommation. Il examine aussi quelques tendances sociales à long terme pour répondre à la question de savoir si la société est en déclin.

Transcription

(en anglais seulement)

Hello and welcome to our video #MacroMemo.

We'll talk about a number of key economic issues in the next several minutes:

  • We'll talk about inflation, which has actually been cooperating quite nicely as the June data comes out.
  • We'll talk a little bit about our latest thinking on recessions. Perhaps it might happen a little bit later, but we do still expect a recession, which I know is an open question in some quarters. We'll talk a bit about the run of data, including some softer labor data.
  • We'll spend a moment thinking about the consumer and just what the outlook might be. We expect some softness there.
  • We'll actually revisit a theme that we touched on late last year, which was the idea of society unraveling or being in decline. We just found a few new metrics to give us a greater sense of what's happening there. The conclusion is ultimately not optimistic, but maybe less pessimistic than you might think.
  • We'll finish with a quick word or two on the British Columbia port strike, which will have some temporary economic consequences for Canada.

Inflation: Let's start with inflation. Inflation continues to improve, that has been a theme since the summer of 2022. So it's not a new theme, but it improved quite nicely in June.

To give you a sense of that, we saw the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI), the annual change, go from 4.0% to 3.0%. So a big drop. In Canada, it went from 3.4% to 2.8%.

Central banks broadly target 2.0% inflation. So you have central banks that are in the same ballpark, with Canada at 2.8%, a percentage point away, with the U.S. at 3%. That's certainly good news. Yes, it's a percentage point higher than the target, but it's a massive improvement on the 8% or 9% annual inflation rate peaks that occurred last summer. So this is a huge improvement.

We believe the improvement is mostly genuine. For instance, in the U.S., if you look at core inflation, which has been a little stickier, it's taken a little longer to come down. Core inflation rose by just 0.16% in June. That's versus May, to be clear, not versus the prior year. 0.16% is the softest single month we've gotten out of U.S. core inflation in two years.

So this was a genuinely softer print, which is good. It comes after three consecutive months of 0.4%. 0.4% is annualized up to about 5% annualized inflation, while 0.16% will get you to about 2%. That is an important step downward, not that it locks in the new number necessarily forever.

I can say when we slice inflation into a few components, goods-side inflation has been declining nicely for quite a while. In fact, technically there's slight deflation on the goods side as we unwind prior price increases. Service inflation ex-shelter (excluding shelter costs) has been turning lower for several months. It's not low, but it's clearly on a downward track. And now we can say that shelter costs are also starting to roll over and that's actually right on schedule.

If it seems confusing because home prices are reviving in a lot of these countries, there's a big, long lag. So what we're beginning to see is the decline from last year starting to show up in the data, that's just starting to hook over. But it's certainly good news. And as I said, it's on schedule as well.

When we look at the breadth of the inflation – that is to say, the fraction of things in the price basket that are rising quickly – that's come down quite a bit as well. For instance, at its worst in the U.S., you had fully a third of the things in the price basket on a weighted basis rising by 10% a year or more. That was last fall, and that's now declined to just 8% of the price basket rising 10% a year or more. So that's a big improvement.

The breadth is being solved, but we think more improvement can come. We think it'll be a slower pace in the coming months, we're not going to go from 3 to 2 next month, as an example. It's going to be a lot slower from here.

And I will give one key word of warning. As we've celebrated inflation coming down and we've seen the breadth has narrowed, we've seen it improving on a number of fronts, I will say there's been disproportionate help from lower gasoline prices.

When we look at inflation ex-motor fuel (excluding motor fuel/gasoline), it's still running in the U.S. at 5.3%. That's two and a half percentage points higher than the official number. We don't think gas prices come down forever, so that may vanish over time. The reality is that without that artificial helping hand, inflation is a little higher than it looks.

So there's still some work to be done, but that trend's improving too. It's just that there's two or three percentage points of inflation realistically to winnow out of the system before we can say we're back to normal, not just one percentage point.

It's fair to say that when you remove all the bad stuff, inflation looks good. When you remove all the good stuff, inflation looks bad. So I'm sensitive and wary of cherry-picking too much. But I think it is fair to say that gas prices won't fall like this indefinitely.

We have had a below-consensus inflation forecast for quite some time, and we still do. So we are optimists on the inflation front. Again, we're expecting further improvement.

We're not looking for a complete return to 2.0% this year, but you can argue that central banks are starting to accomplish their goals. The Bank of Canada has now raised its policy rate to 5%. That might be all they need to do. The U.S. Federal Reserve is scheduled to raise rates, in all likelihood, another quarter percentage point to about 5.5% before too long.

There's a bit more work to be done by some central banks, but it seems to me that what they're doing is starting to work – and they may be in the process of moving to the sidelines before too long.

Recession: Let's pivot from there, let's just talk through some recession musings. The first question is, do we still expect a recession or not?

We haven't had one yet. It's certainly taking its sweet time coming, if it is going to come. We still think a recession is more likely than not. We have various models and various approaches and they're still saying there should be a recession.

We have fairly sophisticated econometric models that say when rates go up by five percentage points, that is normally a recession. That's what the model predicts. We have rules of thumb and heuristics that say when the yield curve inverts or when inflation spikes or a variety of other things happen, you normally get a recession. We are seeing a fair number of those triggered now.

And then lastly, our business cycle work still says pretty convincingly that this is probably an end-of cycle moment. If not, it’s at least a late cycle moment, towards the end of the business cycle, which normally resolves in recession.

So we're sticking with the recession call, but I'll admit that the fact that it hasn't come yet means we've lost a little bit of conviction. We were talking about an 80% chance of a recession. Maybe we should call it a 70% chance. There are ways that it could be avoided, and a magical soft landing happens, but a recession is still more likely, we think.

The bigger question, though, is the subject of timing. When does this recession happen? We had been saying it would be in the third and fourth quarter of this year. You may notice we are in the third quarter right now. In fact, we are several weeks into the third quarter and we haven't gotten a recession yet.

It's still technically possible that we could, we don't have all the July data. We haven't even seen August and September, but the odds are diminishing as time passes. So we are shifting our formal call for recession from the third and fourth quarter of this year, to the fourth quarter of this year and the first quarter of next year. It still could happen this quarter, but it's just less likely, so we've made that shift out of necessity.

Economic data: Economic data may be supporting the recession call. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index continued to fall in June. It’s consistent w­ith the manufacturing sector in contraction. It’s not quite weak enough to be consistent with a broader economy in contraction, but not that far either.

Payrolls/U.S. employment rose by 209,000. That's a perfectly fine number but I will say it is a downward trajectory. It is the weakest single month in two and a half years, which is surely worth something. It was a bit below the consensus, and the revisions to the prior two months subtracted almost 150,000 jobs off the prior two months of job creation. So you can't take away from the fact that there was still job creation and it was still at a reasonable rate. But it used to be an ebullient rate and it is slowing fairly significantly.

Canada’s story for June was somewhat different. Canada added 60,000 jobs. That's a good number for a much smaller population, but maybe not quite as strong as it looks for two reasons.

  1. One was just that there was the loss of 17,000 jobs the prior month. So the trend isn't quite as friendly as it looks. These tend to be choppy numbers and you sort of have to blend them together.
  2. The other thought is that Canada’s population is growing at a million people a year right now. So you need 50,000 jobs a month just to keep pace. And so 60,000 isn't the kind of barnburner it might have been a number of years ago.

Consumer spending: A quick word on the U.S. consumer, really on consumers more generally. We've seen eager, enthusiastic spending over the last several years, but things are starting to change. The eagerness of the spending is diminishing a little bit, even in the official numbers.

We know that stimulus checks have mostly vanished and been significantly spent. We know that inflation erodes purchasing power. We know that higher rates eat into disposable income. That’s being reflected in the fact that savings rates are now lower than normal versus higher than normal a few years ago. And credit card borrowing is really surging.

So we think consumers are feeling a little bit of pressure. Companies are starting to report that. It's been the case for the better part of a year that we've seen some people just shifting down-market in terms of cheaper products and cheaper retailers.

Now we're seeing, for instance, with Amazon Prime Day having occurred recently, the discounts were significantly steeper than in prior years. That reflects a sensitivity to price on the part of consumers and maybe a diminished willingness to spend at all costs. Disney is reporting that attendance at its amusement parks over the summer are significantly lower than normal, so people are splurging a little bit less.

We also know starting in August, specifically in the U.S. context, that student loan payments are set to resume. They were waived, they were canceled effectively for three years, and 45 million Americans will start paying an average of $400 a month as of August. That is going to significantly ding personal incomes, and to a lesser extent, compromise consumer spending.

Society in Decline: Let's talk about this notion of “society in decline.” Just to prep this, there’s a general notion or feeling out there that society is crumbling.

We first addressed this late last year and we looked at things like overdose deaths, homelessness, single parent households, divorce rates, and the crime rate. It wasn't that all of these things were great, but the conclusion was that things were not universally bad. Generally, they were actually a little better than feared or than expected. That was really the takeaway, not that everything was perfect, but it wasn't all going bad at the same time.

We've now really revisited that and looked at some additional variables, and I think the same conclusion ultimately holds. Nevertheless, we looked at a number of things, and probably a few more of them skewed negative this time. Fewer of them did last time. But again, they’re different variables. This is not a change, this is just additional information.

  • The obesity rate, this is U.S. data, continues to rise. Certainly not a good thing, a bad marker for the population in general.
  • The suicide rate has also been rising over time. Not great.
  • The share of population with a disability is rising too. Though I should say if you control for age, because the population is aging, it was actually steady, but nevertheless it wasn't great.
  • The share of the population with a mental health disorder is actually significantly down over the last decade. That was a surprise.
  • The share of the population with a high school education, as you might expect, continues to soar. We're still seeing human capital rise quite impressively.

So there’s no easy way to quantify the relative importance of obesity versus education, or the suicide rate versus the crime rate. You just can't do it. They're apples and oranges.

I would say the latest set of indicators we looked at tilted a bit more negative than positive, though not universally. The prior set we looked at last year arguably did the opposite. It's a nuanced situation. At a minimum, we can say not everything is getting worse, but even that's probably a bit too pessimistic. Society is not obviously circling the drain, is the main takeaway. As an economist, that’s good news for the economy and the viability of the economy over the long run.

B.C. Port Strike: I'll finish very briefly with the British Columbia port strike. The workers at 30 B.C. ports all striked, they did so for 13 days. 63,000 shipping containers were backed up as a consequence of that action, about $10 billion in trade was disrupted.

This was a big deal. The economic damage is real. The damages may be smaller than you might think, though. It's not $10 billion off Gross Domestic Product (GDP) because $10 billion was the value of the goods not shipped, not the value-added of the ports. Those goods will still be shipped, albeit with a delay. I wouldn't want to underestimate the cost to businesses of not getting their products on time. That's a real hassle, that's a supply chain issue that's flared up temporarily in a Canadian context.

Realistically, we're talking about a couple of tenths chopped off GDP maybe in the month of July, recouping that over the span of a few months after that. We could see a hair more inflation in July and August than otherwise, but we’re temporarily not inclined to think this has a lasting effect. Though in fairness, only time will tell how quickly those ships can now be unloaded.

Thanks so much for your time, as always. I hope you found that interesting. And please tune in again next time.

Pour en savoir plus, consultez le #MacroMémo de cette semaine.

Déclarations

Le présent document est fourni par RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs (RBC GMA) à titre indicatif seulement. Il ne peut être ni reproduit, ni distribué, ni publié sans le consentement écrit préalable de RBC GMA ou de ses entités affiliées mentionnées dans les présentes. Le présent document ne constitue pas une offre d’achat ou de vente ou la sollicitation d’achat ou de vente de titres, de produits ou de services, et ce, dans tous les territoires. Il n’a pas non plus pour objectif de fournir des conseils juridiques, comptables, fiscaux, financiers, liés aux placements ou autres, et ne doit pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. Ce document ne peut pas être distribué aux investisseurs résidant dans les territoires où une telle distribution est interdite.

RBC GMA est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc., RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited et RBC Global Asset Management (Asia) Limited, qui sont des filiales distinctes, mais affiliées de RBC.

Au Canada, le présent document est fourni par RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc. (y compris par PH&N Institutionnel) et/ou par RBC Gestion d’actifs Indigo Inc. Chacune de ces entités est régie par chaque commission provinciale ou territoriale des valeurs mobilières auprès de laquelle elle est inscrite. Aux États-Unis, ce document est fourni par RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., un conseiller en placement agréé par le gouvernement fédéral. En Europe, ce document est fourni par RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, qui est agréée et régie par la Financial Conduct Authority du Royaume-Uni. En Asie, ce document est fourni par RBC Global Asset Management (Asia) Limited, qui est inscrite auprès de la Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) de Hong Kong.

Vous trouverez des précisions sur RBC GMA au www.rbcgam.com.

Ce document n’a pas été revu par une autorité en valeurs mobilières ou toute autre autorité de réglementation et n’est inscrit auprès d’aucune d’entre elles. Il peut, s’il est approprié et permis de le faire, être distribué par les entités susmentionnées dans leur territoire respectif.

Tout renseignement prospectif sur les placements ou l’économie contenu dans le présent document a été obtenu par RBC GMA auprès de plusieurs sources. Les renseignements obtenus de tiers sont jugés fiables, mais ni RBC GMA, ni ses sociétés affiliées, ni aucune autre personne n’en garantissent explicitement ou implicitement l’exactitude, l’intégralité ou la pertinence. RBC GMA et ses sociétés affiliées n’assument aucune responsabilité à l’égard des erreurs ou des omissions relatives à ces renseignements.

Les opinions contenues dans le présent document reflètent le jugement et le leadership éclairé de RBC GMA, et peuvent changer à tout moment. Ces opinions sont données à titre indicatif seulement et ne visent pas à fournir des conseils financiers ou liés aux placements et ne doivent pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. RBC GMA n’est pas tenue de mettre à jour ces opinions.

RBC GMA se réserve le droit, à tout moment et sans préavis, de corriger ou de modifier ces renseignements, ou de cesser de les publier.

Les rendements antérieurs ne sont pas garants des résultats futurs. Comme toutes les stratégies de placement, celle-ci comporte un risque de perdre la totalité ou une partie du montant investi. Les rendements estimatifs indiqués, le cas échéant, sont présentés à titre indicatif seulement et ne constituent en aucun cas des prévisions. Les rendements réels pourraient être supérieurs ou inférieurs à ceux indiqués, et pourraient varier considérablement, surtout à court terme. Il est impossible d’investir directement dans un indice.

Certains énoncés contenus dans ce document peuvent être considérés comme étant des énoncés prospectifs, lesquels expriment des attentes ou des prévisions actuelles à l’égard de résultats ou d’événements futurs. Les énoncés prospectifs ne sont pas des garanties de rendements ou d’événements futurs et comportent des risques et des incertitudes. Il convient de ne pas se fier indûment à ces énoncés, puisque les résultats ou les événements réels pourraient différer considérablement de ceux qui y sont indiqués en raison de divers facteurs. Avant de prendre une décision de placement, nous vous invitons à prendre en compte attentivement tous les facteurs pertinents.
® / MC Marque(s) de commerce de Banque Royale du Canada, utilisée(s) sous licence.
© RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc. 2023