Vous consultez actuellement le site Web destiné aux clients institutionnels du Canada. Vous pouvez modifier votre lieu de résidence ici ou visiter d’autres sites Web de RBC GMA.

Bienvenue sur le site RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs pour investisseurs institutionnels
English

Pour accéder au site, veuillez accepter nos conditions générales.

Veuillez lire les conditions générales suivantes attentivement. En accédant au site rbcgam.com et aux pages qu’il contient (le « site »), vous acceptez d'être lié par ces conditions ainsi que par toute modification que pourrait apporter RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs Inc. (« RBC GMA Inc. ») à sa discrétion. Si vous n'acceptez pas les conditions générales figurant ci-dessous, n’accédez pas à ce site Web ni aux pages qu’il contient. Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements est une division de RBC GMA Inc.

Aucune offre

Les produits et services de RBC GMA Inc. ne sont offerts que dans les territoires où ils peuvent être légalement mis en vente. Le contenu de ce site Web ne constitue ni une offre de vente ni une sollicitation d'achat de produits ou de services à qui que ce soit dans tout territoire où une telle offre où sollicitation est considérée comme illégale.

Aucun renseignement figurant sur ce site Web ne doit être interprété comme un conseil en matière de placement ni comme une recommandation ou une déclaration à propos de la pertinence ou du caractère approprié de tout produit ou service. L'ampleur du risque associé à un placement particulier dépend largement de la situation personnelle de l'investisseur.

Aucune utilisation

Le matériel figurant sur ce site a été fourni par RBC GMA Inc. à titre d'information uniquement ; il ne peut être reproduit, distribué ou publié sans le consentement écrit de RBC GMA Inc. Ce matériel ne sert qu'à fournir de l'information générale et ne constitue ni ne prétend être une description complète des solutions d'investissement et des stratégies offertes par RBC GMA Inc., y compris les fonds RBC, les portefeuilles privés RBC, les fonds PH&N, les fonds de catégorie de société RBC ainsi que les FNB RBC (les « fonds »). En cas de divergence entre ce document et les notices d'offre respectives, les dispositions des notices d'offre prévaudront.

RBC GMA Inc. prend des mesures raisonnables pour fournir des renseignements exacts, fiables et à jour, et les croit ainsi au moment de les publier. Les renseignements obtenus auprès de tiers sont jugés uniquement ; toutefois, aucune déclaration ni garantie, expresse ou implicite, n'est faite par RBC GMA Inc., ses sociétés affiliées ou toute autre personne quant à leur exactitude, leur intégralité ou leur bien-fondé. RBC GMA Inc. n'assume aucune responsabilité pour de telles erreurs ou des omissions. Les points de vue et les opinions exprimés sur le présent site Web sont ceux de RBC GMA Inc. et peuvent changer sans préavis.

À propos de nos fonds

Les fonds de RBC GMA Inc. sont distribués par l'entremise de courtiers autorisés. Les investissements dans les fonds peuvent comporter le paiement de commissions, de commissions de suivi, de frais et de dépenses de gestion. Veuillez lire la notice d'offre propre à chaque fonds avant d'investir. Les données sur le rendement fournies sont des rendements historiques et ne reflètent en aucun cas les valeurs futures des fonds ou des rendements sur les placements des fonds. Par ailleurs, les données sur le rendement fournies tiennent compte seulement du réinvestissement des distributions et ne tiennent pas compte des frais d'achat, de rachat, de distribution ou des frais optionnels ni des impôts à payer par tout porteur de parts qui auraient pour effet de réduire le rendement. Les valeurs unitaires des fonds autres que ceux de marché monétaire varient fréquemment. Il n'y a aucune garantie que les fonds de marché monétaire seront en mesure de maintenir leur valeur liquidative par part à un niveau constant ou que vous récupérerez le montant intégral de votre placement dans le fonds. Les titres de fonds communs de placement ne sont pas garantis par la Société d'assurance-dépôts du Canada ni par aucun autre organisme gouvernemental d'assurance-dépôts. Les rendements antérieurs peuvent ne pas se répéter. Les parts de FNB sont achetées et vendues au prix du marché en bourse et les commissions de courtage réduiront les rendements. Les FNB RBC ne cherchent pas à produire un rendement d'un montant prédéterminé à la date d'échéance. Les rendements de l'indice ne représentent pas les rendements des FNB RBC.

À propos de RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs

RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe les sociétés affiliées suivantes situées partout dans le monde, toutes étant des filiales indirectes de RBC : RBC GMA Inc. (y compris Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements et PH&N Institutionnel), RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, RBC Investment Management (Asia) Limited, BlueBay Asset Management LLP, and BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC.

Déclarations prospectives

Ce document peut contenir des déclarations prospectives à l'égard des facteurs économiques en général qui ne garantissent pas le rendement futur. Les déclarations prospectives comportent des incertitudes et des risques inhérents, et donc les prédictions, prévisions, projections et autres déclarations prospectives pourraient ne pas se réaliser. Nous vous recommandons de ne pas vous fier indûment à ces déclarations, puisqu'un certain nombre de facteurs importants pourraient faire en sorte que les événements ou les résultats réels diffèrent considérablement de ceux qui sont mentionnés, explicitement ou implicitement, dans une déclaration prospective. Toutes les opinions contenues dans les déclarations prospectives peuvent être modifiées sans préavis et sont fournies de bonne foi, mais sans responsabilité légale.

Accepter Déclin
15 minutes, 20 seconds pour regarder Par  Eric Lascelles 31 mai 2024

Alors que l’inflation commence à fléchir et que les baisses de taux sont amorcées, Eric Lascelles fait part de signes encourageants dans la dernière vidéo du #MacroMémo. Il examine les données sur l’inflation et la politique des banques centrales, y compris les prochaines décisions de la Banque d’Angleterre, de la Banque centrale européenne, de la Banque du Canada et de la Réserve fédérale des États-Unis. Il se penche également sur les sujets suivants :

  • La convergence grandissante entre l’économie des États-Unis, qui ralentit, et celle d’autres pays, qui commencent à rattraper leur retard.

  • Les perspectives de la consommation, y compris les dépenses, l’épargne, les salaires et la croissance de l’emploi. 

  • Les derniers chiffres sur le logement et la croissance en Chine.

Durée : 15 minutes, 20 seconds

Transcription

(en anglais seulement)

Hello and welcome to our video #MacroMemo. There's quite a bit to cover off this week.

  • We'll talk about inflation, the idea that it's actually starting to fall again after a difficult period earlier in the year.
  • We'll talk about central banks potentially in motion very soon after I record this. And so it's exciting to think about more central banks entering that rate cutting phase.
  • We'll talk a bit about economic convergence. So the U.S. was an exceptional economy and now it's becoming a bit less exceptional as other countries catch up in a growth context. We'll nevertheless talk about how the U.S. is probably okay though, so we're not too, too worried about its recent deceleration.
  • We'll talk about the consumer, specifically the U.S. consumer, and that's really a story of people nervous about a consumer that could lose steam. But we think actually the U.S. consumer’s probably okay.
  • We'll finish with a couple of China topics. One is Chinese housing, which got some new stimulus really targeted in a different direction and more of the unsold inventory of homes as opposed to builders directly or to home prices or mortgage access. And we'll talk about China growth and whether we can believe the numbers and what we should believe.

That's a lot. So let's jump in here.

U.S. inflation: We'll start with easing inflation. And so I can say that the main macro theme for the first part of 2024 was not easing inflation. It was intensifying inflation or misbehaving inflation. We had inflation that had been performing and declining nicely from mid-2022 to the end of 2023. And then it started to revive and that wasn't good. That complicated everyone's lives.

And so the April data has since come out and it's looking better. That's really important. Not low, but going in the right direction For the U.S., service inflation is still too hot, but a little bit less so. We think within that, shelter cost inflation can keep coming down from here. We think insurance inflation can turn lower before too long.

We know that we lost some seasonal distortions in the first quarter that made inflation look hotter than it otherwise would have been. And looking forward, we are hopeful that we continue to see some decline in inflation.

  • One reason for optimism is the price of oil. The price of gas is actually falling in May and hopefully into early June.
  • The labor market continues to ease a little bit in a way that might cool wages, might cool inflation.
  • We've seen retailers announcing some price cuts, prominently Walmart, Target and McDonald's all announcing price cuts. That's not something you would have heard a lot about a few years ago.

It does sound like a time where inflation should be coming down as consumers become more price sensitive. Maybe where push comes to shove, we can see some of the real-time inflation metrics out there continuing to improve in a pretty important way into the month of May. And so we think we can get inflation continuing to improve in May. We're banking on a further declining trend over the remainder of the year.

Unlikely to be smooth. Unlikely to be fast. I'm sure we'll have a few hiccups along the way. But we are constructive on where inflation is going.

Other developed world countries: Just briefly, in terms of other countries, not the U.S., on the inflation front: they never got quite as high in recent months. I never saw quite the same backup in early 2024. But still, the April numbers that have come out have been mostly pretty constructive here.

  • Canadian CPI (Consumer Price Index) fell from 2.9 to 2.7%.
  • UK CPI fell a long way from 3.2 to 2.3%.
  • Eurozone CPI was steady, but it was steady at 2.4%, which isn't that much above the 2% number that a lot of central banks are trying to target.

And so I would say, again, the inflation story was bad. It's becoming a little bit better.

Let's pivot from there. Let's talk central banks.

Central banks: It's a natural segue because, of course, central banks are responding primarily to where inflation is. So they must be feeling at least a bit better. We've already seen rate cutting cycles begun in a fair swath of the world. So a certain fraction of emerging market central banks have been easing for months, if not quarters.

Switzerland, Sweden, developed world central banks have now started to cut rates, though they are the only two of note so far. We may get a pretty big player cutting rates rather soon. I am recording this in very, very late May. On June 6, the European Central Bank (ECB) is scheduled to render its next decision and expectations are in the realm of an 90% likelihood that the ECB cuts rates for the first time. So that's looking quite likely.

Indeed, European inflation is down into the low twos. The European economy is looking okay. They don't need rates to be this restrictive.

The Bank of England at one point was thought likely to cut rates in June. It's not impossible, but it's looking less likely now. And that's for two reasons.

  1. One was even though UK inflation fell a lot in the month of April, it actually didn't quite fall as much as everybody had hoped for. That technically counted as a slight inflation miss and so that might slow the Bank of England down.
  2. The other reason is the UK now has an election scheduled for July 4th. And so there's a general thought that maybe the UK just waits until after that election to deliver its first rate cut. So maybe the Bank of England now goes in August, as opposed to what had once looked like a June possibility.

That brings us to the Bank of Canada, which is actually scheduled to be first of all possibly with its June 5th decision date. The market is pricing a 60% or so chance of a cut, most of a cut or more than half, I should say. The cut is priced in. It's entirely possible the Bank of Canada cuts rates in June.

We're slightly more sympathetic to the July date. So there's also a July decision date. I might say that one, in my mind, is a hair more likely than June, but it's pretty close to a 50/50 proposition.

So I think Canada could be cutting rates very soon indeed. To me, in fact, it's probably less of an issue exactly whether it's June or July, it's more of a story of if they go in June, they won't in July.

If they go in July, they won't have in June. Either way, it's pretty likely that the Bank of Canada reduces its policy rate from 5% to four and three quarters by late summer.

One of the reasons we prefer August is just that it then reduces the gap to the U.S. easing, which might happen in the fall. There's sometimes concern if the Bank of Canada moves significantly differently than the U.S.

But again, June is entirely possible. The next time we talk it could be in the context of the Bank of Canada already easing rates.

We think from there for all of these central banks, it's likely to be a pretty gradual stop and go affair. Not every meeting, not large rate cuts. But all the same, we do believe that a neutral rate is a couple of percentage points below where we are right now.

So there should be room for a fairly concerted easing over the span of a year or two, at least.

At the Fed (U.S. Federal Reserve), by the way, is likely to start cutting rates later. And so right now, September looks like a possibility, though there certainly are some who think the Fed might not get around to it until early 2025. So that's a possibility. But we would say the fall of 2024 is more likely at this point.

Let's pivot from there. Let's talk convergence.

Economic convergence: This is more of a pure economic theme. And so the U.S. was an exceptional economy in 2023. It outgrew everyone by a significant margin. Now the U.S. economy is slowing to some extent. Just a couple examples of that would be first quarter GDP (gross domestic product) was down to sub-2% growth after some quarters of 3, 4, or 5.

The ISM (Institute for Supply Management) manufacturing and services indices both slipped recently actually below 50, which technically would signal contraction. Retail sales were flat in the latest month. Payrolls were up just fine, but they were up not as quickly as they had been in prior months. So the U.S. economy is slowing down.

Simultaneously, we are getting signs of strength in other countries, other developed countries.

  • UK and Eurozone GDP were positive for the first quarter. That's actually an impressive accomplishment. Those countries hadn't been reliably growing toward the end of 2023.
  • Germany's big business confidence index is up nicely. We're also seeing purchasing manager indices rise.
  • Japan's important Tankan survey is rising.
  • Canadian employment was quite strong in the latest month of April.

So it would appear the rest of the world is maybe even accelerating.

I think the way to think about this is really just that it is actually convergence. The U.S. economy was strong and now it's slowing to a more moderate pace. The rest of the world was pretty weak and now it's reviving to a more a more moderate pace.

I think it is interesting, though, to think of it from an investment standpoint because the U.S. stock market has been easily the champion and now there's the opportunity for some of these other markets that are cheaper, and in some cases also have undervalued exchange rates, there is some opportunity perhaps for them to perform. Not that it's all about GDP growth when it comes to the stock market, of course.

So as the U.S. economy slows, is the U.S. economy okay? I think the answer is probably yes. Admittedly, there is a question mark here because a happy soft landing which involves a deceleration to a reasonable rate of growth is initially indistinguishable from a less happy hard landing.

The latter also involves an initial deceleration, but one, of course, that continues. So we do need to watch closely to make sure the U.S. is doing the former (soft landing) and not the latter (hard landing).

I'll talk about the consumer in a moment, but I can say we still feel pretty confident the U.S. economy is on track to grow at a reasonable rate.

  • We're tracking second quarter GDP growth that's in the realm of 3%. So that's actually a bit better than the first quarter.
  • Weekly jobless claims had reasons for worry a couple of weeks ago, but for a funny, temporary, distorted reason to do with the timing of Easter and the context of New York State teachers, believe it or not. And so that slipped back down, jobless claims are still low and trending sideways, which is good.
  • We've seen capital goods orders pick up.
  • We've seen the demand for U.S. freight actually picking up after a period of weakness.
  • We are seeing corporate reporting talk very, very little about recession fears or layoff plans. So that's promising as well.

And so we do think that this is most likely a U.S. soft landing story, not the beginning of something worse for the U.S.

Consumer outlook: Now as I say that, we do need to talk about the U.S. consumer for a moment because there are consumer worries right now and it's not unreasonable to be at least a little bit concerned. Higher rates, of course, bite everywhere, not just in the U.S.

  • We have seen U.S. credit card usage growth slowing and so that is less of a support for spending.
  • We've seen pandemic era savings mostly used up. Indeed, the personal savings rate in the U.S. is pretty low, which suggests a limited scope for spending growth to continue outpacing income growth in any event.
  • We do see some downgrading going on, you see that people are shifting their spending from luxury stores to discount stores in a way that does suggest people are at least becoming more prudent or maybe even experiencing some stress.

And so I think it's right to think that the consumer outlook is for more modest or at best, moderate spending growth from here. I would push back against the idea that there's serious trouble with the U.S. consumer, though. And one of the reasons is just that the most important thing when we talk about the consumer is what's the job market up to?

And it's slowed, but it's slowed to a very healthy level. And when you have hiring continuing at a healthy rate, that's the big determinant of spending. And so spending can continue to be mostly fine.

Maybe the next most important thing is what’s happening with wages. And wage growth is slowing, but it's still pretty robust. So this is still supportive of spending.

Yes, higher rates hurt, but the majority of American households are handling higher rates fine. In fact, if we look at the share of income going to service debt, it's actually completely normal in the U.S. right now. It was really low there for a moment post-pandemic, but it's just returned to pre-pandemic levels at this point. So there isn't a huge chunk of savings at this point of income going to spending on interest and on the principal for debt.

That's actually not maybe the issue for now that it had had once been expected to be. And we still see wealth accumulating. So people are saving less and maybe that's a limiter, but keep in mind, the stock market's going up. People are getting richer. Home prices have gone up a lot over the last five years. That's a lot of wealth that people could choose to deploy if they needed to.

And so at the end of the day, we think that the consumer is in okay shape. There have been some anecdotal accounts of maybe vacation, holiday spending, weakening. We're not seeing it. We have real-time metrics for hotel usage and for airlines in the U.S., and both are actually flat to rising and look quite normal by seasonal standards.

So the takeaway for us is the U.S. consumer is not going to be the hero of the economy going forward, but I don't think it's going to be an outright millstone either. I think it's going to be a time of modest to moderate growth.

China housing: Now let's talk about China, in two ways. First, Chinese housing. The housing market has been very weak, and you have insolvent builders and falling home prices and falling activity and all sorts of issues. We've detailed those in the past.

I do want to flag one important and promising new policy. So China's already done some things. They've already cut rates and they've cut mortgage rates and they've reduced down payments required. They've done things to try to stabilize housing.

They're trying something new now, a new approach. And so the new approach is a major fund. It's 500 billion renminbi, which is almost 100 billion USD. And they're using that to help digest a completed but unsold housing unit.

So builders have built units they weren't able to sell This is a problem for the builders. It's kind of a waste and inefficiency for the economy. And so they're giving money to local governments, so local governments will buy these units and use them as affordable housing. And so it seems like a pretty promising strategy. It's being viewed quite favorably.

I'm not sure I'd expect Chinese housing to zoom higher from here. The amount of money being put to work isn't enough to absorb the entirety of the excess inventory, or anything close to that. But nevertheless, it does suggest to us that Chinese housing can stabilize over time. We think it's a multi-year journey before we can talk about any kind of strength, because it will take time for affordability and construction levels and builder health and indeed inventories to fully normalize.

China’s economy: I'll finish just really quickly. China's economy, we think, is tracking about 5% growth. When I tell people that, they say, okay, but do you believe the numbers? Because there is some history of local governments fabricating numbers and there is some history of China's growth being weirdly smooth compared to everybody else in a way that suggests maybe there is something going on beneath the surface.

This isn't the definitive final account on this subject. It's obviously an important subject. But we do look at some alternative measures that are less easy to fabricate. Some, like international trade, just can't be because you can cross-check with the countries trading with China. So that's one that you could have a high level of confidence in.

But we can look at things like electricity usage and rail shipping statistics and other things that don't go as processed through the statistical agency. In fact, we look at three aggregates that look at different slices of those sorts of things. And believe it or not, two of the three argue that Chinese growth, if anything, is a little quicker than the GDP numbers say right now. The other, of course, by definition would say that it's a little bit slower.

Just to show how imprecise these are, though, one says the Chinese economy's accelerating, one says it's flattening, one says it's decelerating. So some contradictions there.

But on the aggregate, you're seeing some lines that are pretty close to what Chinese GDP is up to. And so I would say I think Chinese economic estimates right now are not far from the truth. China's growing at about a 5% rate. We think it will slow to a 3-4% rate over time. I don't think there's a great secret there.

Okay. So maybe on that anticlimactic ending, I'll just say thanks very much for your time. I hope you found this interesting and useful and please tune in again.

Pour en savoir plus, consultez le #MacroMemo

Déclarations

Ce support est fourni par RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs (RBC GMA) à titre indicatif seulement. Il ne peut être ni reproduit, ni distribué, ni publié sans le consentement écrit préalable de RBC GMA ou de ses entités affiliées mentionnées dans les présentes. Il ne constitue pas une offre d’achat ou de vente ou la sollicitation d’achat ou de vente de titres, de produits ou de services, et ce, dans tous les territoires. Il n’a pas non plus pour objectif de fournir des conseils financiers, juridiques, comptables, fiscaux, liés aux placements ou autres, et ne doit pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. Il ne peut pas être distribué aux investisseurs résidant dans les territoires où une telle distribution est interdite.

RBC GMA est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc. (RBC GMA), RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. (RBC GAM (US)), RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited (RBC GAM (UK)), RBC Global Asset Management (Asia) Limited (RBC GAM (Asia)), qui sont des filiales distinctes, mais affiliées de RBC.

Au Canada, ce support est fourni par RBC GMA (y compris par PH&N Institutionnel), chacune étant régie par chaque commission provinciale ou territoriale des valeurs mobilières auprès de laquelle elle est inscrite. Aux États-Unis, il est fourni par RBC GAM (US), un conseiller en placement agréé par le gouvernement fédéral. En Europe, il est fourni par RBC GAM (UK), qui est agréée et régie par la Financial Conduct Authority du Royaume-Uni. En Asie, il est fourni par RBC GAM (Asia), qui est inscrite auprès de la Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) de Hong Kong.

Vous trouverez des informations complémentaires sur RBC GMA sur le site Web www.rbcgam.com.

Ce support n’a pas été revu par une autorité en valeurs mobilières ou toute autre autorité de réglementation et n’est inscrit auprès d’aucune d’entre elles. Il peut, s’il est approprié et permis de le faire, être distribué par les entités susmentionnées dans leur territoire respectif.

Tout renseignement prospectif sur les placements ou l’économie contenu dans ce support a été obtenu par RBC GMA auprès de plusieurs sources. Les renseignements obtenus de tiers sont jugés fiables, mais ni RBC GMA, ni ses sociétés affiliées, ni aucune autre personne n’en garantissent explicitement ou implicitement l’exactitude, l’intégralité ou la pertinence. RBC GMA et ses sociétés affiliées n’assument aucune responsabilité à l’égard des erreurs ou des omissions relatives à ces renseignements.

Les opinions contenues dans le présent support reflètent le jugement et le leadership éclairé de RBC GMA, et peuvent changer à tout moment. Elles sont données à titre indicatif seulement et ne visent pas à fournir des conseils financiers ou liés aux placements et ne doivent pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. RBC GMA n’est pas tenue de mettre à jour ces opinions.

RBC GMA se réserve le droit, à tout moment et sans préavis, de corriger ou de modifier ces renseignements, ou de cesser de les publier.

Les rendements antérieurs ne sont pas garants des résultats futurs. Tout placement comporte un risque de perdre la totalité ou une partie du montant investi. Les rendements estimatifs indiqués, le cas échéant, sont présentés à titre indicatif seulement et ne constituent en aucun cas des prévisions. Les rendements réels pourraient être supérieurs ou inférieurs à ceux indiqués et pourraient varier considérablement, surtout à court terme. Il est impossible d’investir directement dans un indice.

Certains énoncés contenus dans ce support peuvent être considérés comme étant des énoncés prospectifs, lesquels expriment des attentes ou des prévisions actuelles à l’égard de résultats ou d’événements futurs. Les énoncés prospectifs ne sont pas des garanties de rendements ou d’événements futurs et comportent des risques et des incertitudes. Il convient de ne pas se fier indûment à ces énoncés, puisque les résultats ou les événements réels pourraient différer considérablement de ceux qui y sont indiqués en raison de divers facteurs. Avant de prendre une décision de placement, nous vous invitons à prendre en compte attentivement tous les facteurs pertinents.

®/MC Marque(s) de commerce de Banque Royale du Canada, utilisée sous licence.

© RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc., 2025