Vous consultez actuellement le site Web destiné aux clients institutionnels du Canada. Vous pouvez modifier votre lieu de résidence ici ou visiter d’autres sites Web de RBC GMA.

Bienvenue sur le site institutionnel ph & n pour les investisseurs institutionnels
English

Pour accéder au site, veuillez accepter nos conditions générales.

Veuillez lire les conditions générales suivantes attentivement. En accédant aux sites rbcgma.com et à toute autre page de ceux-ci (le « site »), vous acceptez d'être lié par ces conditions ainsi que par toute modification que pourrait apporter RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs Inc. (« RBC GMA Inc. ») à sa discrétion. Si vous n'acceptez pas les conditions générales figurant ci-dessous, n'accédez pas à ce site Web ou à toute page de celui-ci. Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements est une division de RBC GMA Inc.

Aucune offre

PLes produits et les services de RBC GMA Inc. ne sont offerts que dans les territoires de compétence au sein desquels ils peuvent être vendus légalement. Le contenu de ce site Web ne représente pas une offre de vente ni une sollicitation d'achat de produits ou de services auprès de toute personne dans un territoire de compétence au sein duquel une telle offre ou sollicitation est considérée comme illégale.

Aucun renseignement figurant sur ce site Web ne doit être interprété comme un conseil en matière de placement ni comme une recommandation ou une représentation de la pertinence ou du caractère approprié de tout produit ou service. L'ampleur du risque associé à un placement particulier dépend largement de la situation personnelle de l'investisseur.

Aucune utilisation

Le matériel figurant sur ce site a été fourni par RBC GMA Inc. à titre d'information uniquement ; il ne peut être reproduit, distribué ou publié sans le consentement écrit de RBC GMA Inc. Ce matériel ne sert qu'à fournir de l'information générale et ne constitue ni ne prétend être une description complète des solutions d'investissement et des stratégies offertes par RBC GMA Inc., y compris les fonds RBC, les portefeuilles privés RBC, les fonds PH&N, les fonds de catégorie de société RBC ainsi que les FNB RBC (les « fonds »). En cas de divergence entre ce document et les notices d'offre respectives, les dispositions des notices d'offre prévaudront.

RBC GMA Inc. prend des mesures raisonnables pour fournir des renseignements exacts, fiables et à jour, et les croit ainsi au moment de les publier. Les renseignements obtenus auprès de tiers sont jugés uniquement ; toutefois, aucune déclaration ni garantie, expresse ou implicite, n'est faite par RBC GMA Inc., ses sociétés affiliées ou toute autre personne quant à leur exactitude, leur intégralité ou leur bien-fondé. RBC GMA Inc. n'assume aucune responsabilité pour de telles erreurs ou des omissions. Les points de vue et les opinions exprimés sur le présent site Web sont ceux de RBC GMA Inc. et peuvent changer sans préavis.

À propos de nos fonds

Les fonds de RBC GMA Inc. sont distribués par l'entremise de courtiers autorisés. Les investissements dans les fonds peuvent comporter le paiement de commissions, de commissions de suivi, de frais et de dépenses de gestion. Veuillez lire la notice d'offre propre à chaque fonds avant d'investir. Les données sur le rendement fournies sont des rendements historiques et ne reflètent en aucun cas les valeurs futures des fonds ou des rendements sur les placements des fonds. Par ailleurs, les données sur le rendement fournies tiennent compte seulement du réinvestissement des distributions et ne tiennent pas compte des frais d'achat, de rachat, de distribution ou des frais optionnels ni des impôts à payer par tout porteur de parts qui auraient pour effet de réduire le rendement. Les valeurs unitaires des fonds autres que ceux de marché monétaire varient fréquemment. Il n'y a aucune garantie que les fonds de marché monétaire seront en mesure de maintenir leur valeur liquidative par part à un niveau constant ou que vous récupérerez le montant intégral de votre placement dans le fonds. Les titres de fonds communs de placement ne sont pas garantis par la Société d'assurance-dépôts du Canada ni par aucun autre organisme gouvernemental d'assurance-dépôts. Les rendements antérieurs peuvent ne pas se répéter. Les parts de FNB sont achetées et vendues au prix du marché en bourse et les commissions de courtage réduiront les rendements. Les FNB RBC ne cherchent pas à produire un rendement d'un montant prédéterminé à la date d'échéance. Les rendements de l'indice ne représentent pas les rendements des FNB RBC.

À propos de RBC Gestion mondiale d'actifs

RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe les sociétés affiliées suivantes situées partout dans le monde, toutes étant des filiales indirectes de RBC : RBC GMA Inc. (y compris Phillips, Hager & North gestion de placements et PH&N Institutionnel), RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, RBC Investment Management (Asia) Limited, BlueBay Asset Management LLP, and BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC.

Déclarations prospectives

Ce document peut contenir des déclarations prospectives à l'égard des facteurs économiques en général qui ne garantissent pas le rendement futur. Les déclarations prospectives comportent des incertitudes et des risques inhérents, et donc les prédictions, prévisions, projections et autres déclarations prospectives pourraient ne pas se réaliser. Nous vous recommandons de ne pas vous fier indûment à ces déclarations, puisqu'un certain nombre de facteurs importants pourraient faire en sorte que les événements ou les résultats réels diffèrent considérablement de ceux qui sont mentionnés, explicitement ou implicitement, dans une déclaration prospective. Toutes les opinions contenues dans les déclarations prospectives peuvent être modifiées sans préavis et sont fournies de bonne foi, mais sans responsabilité légale.

Accepter Déclin
Par  Eric Lascelles 12 février 2024

Notre économiste en chef continue d’analyser les données afin de déterminer si nous nous dirigeons vers une récession marquée ou un atterrissage en douceur. L’ambiguïté des signaux fait en sorte que l’incertitude est plus élevée que d’habitude. Voici toutefois quelques éléments positifs :

  • La majorité des indicateurs de notre feuille de pointage du cycle économique signalent que celui-ci est à un stade avancé, mais certains donnent à penser que nous avons évité la récession et qu’un nouveau cycle a débuté. 

  • Bien qu’il soit encore faible, l’indice ISM (Institute for Supply Management) du secteur manufacturier a grimpé de deux points, ce qui est beaucoup.

  • La tendance baissière des marges bénéficiaires sur le marché boursier américain est en train de s’inverser.

  • Le produit intérieur brut (PIB) du Canada a été légèrement supérieur aux attentes au quatrième trimestre.

  • L’inflation continue de diminuer, même s’il reste certainement du travail à faire et que des risques subsistent.

 Dans ce numéro, vous trouverez aussi un examen de la situation économique en Chine, y compris de la déflation, et un aperçu de l’incidence du recul des inscriptions dans les universités américaines. 

Durée : 13 minutes, 48 secondes

Transcription

(en anglais seulement)

Welcome to our video #MacroMemo. We've got a whole lot to share with you this week. Among those things, we’ll look at the business cycle. We've updated our scorecard. I can share with you what we're seeing there in terms of the point in the cycle.

We'll continue to talk about the soft landing versus hard landing debate. And I would say the soft-landing odds continue to rise.

We'll talk about the number two in the context of 2% inflation, which of course, is the goal for many central banks, and certainly not an achieved goal for the most part. But we are starting to get some inflation readings that are in the twos, albeit in the high twos right now. So I think that's cause for some celebration.

We'll talk about China in four acts, that is to say, we'll talk about China in the context of its economy, policy responses, inflation and demographics briefly. And then we'll finish with a quick comment on the U.S. educational attainment and the fact that this is now starting to fall and whether that's a problem for productivity and so on.

Okay, so let's start with the business cycle. This is a scorecard we update quarterly and it canvasses nearly 100 variables and gives some estimates as to where we are in the cycle. And it has a grand time, by the way, disagreeing with itself. Different variables think that we're in a different point in the economic cycle, but we combine all of these and you do tend to get something of an interesting conclusion.

The single best guess of our current scorecard is that this is a ‘late cycle’ moment. Technically, that's a small step backwards. We had been getting ‘end of cycle’ readings a quarter ago.

I don't want to argue, though, that that's the main takeaway. I would say that's almost secondary. To me there are two other main takeaways. The first one is just that this scorecard isn't precise.

It's a rough estimate. And when you look at what it's saying, it's ascribing a pretty significant probability that we are in the late cycle, end of cycle or even recession. So those are the three final points of the business cycle. So the point here is that most of the indications, in fact, I believe about 66% of the inputs are pointing to a pretty late point in the cycle, speaking to a degree of vulnerability to decline.

I think that's probably the main takeaway. I will note one other thing, though. This is something we've seen a little bit of in the past, but it became much more prominent in this latest quarter, which is that you have a fourth category in the business cycle that's also starting to get significant votes and that is ‘start of cycle.’

Now it's less than 20% of the total. As I said, those later cycle assessments are more than 66%. And so here we are with no clear conclusion. The best guess is still that it's pretty far along, but you are getting a rising share and a non-trivial share, saying maybe this is the start of a new cycle and maybe we've avoided a recession and we're already starting anew.

The more likely scenario is that we haven't done that. But maybe the point is, or the secondary point is that our business cycle scorecard is acknowledging that a soft landing is entirely possible as well, and maybe that is in the process of happening.

Okay, on from there, let's talk again soft landing versus hard landing. The general theme has been one in which the soft-landing likelihood, the likelihood of avoiding recession, has been rising. The likelihood of tumbling into recession has been arguably falling somewhat.

Both are still entirely conceivable. In fact, officially, we're still saying a recession is a bit more likely than a soft landing. So certainly both are conceivable, but it is a moving target. And there has been some recent notable support for a soft-landing outcome. Recent examples in the data space would be U.S. payrolls rose by 353,000 jobs in January.

That was a lot more than expected. It was a fabulous number in an absolute sense. The ISM (Institute for Supply Management) Manufacturing Index is still sub-50, which is weak, but it rose by two points, which is a lot. It’s up to 49, which I guess mathematically is just barely below that 50 threshold but delineates contraction from expansion and it's the highest in 50 months.

And so we're seeing a positive trend there.

U.S. home prices are also tentatively rising. Housing is deserving of particular attention because of course it's such a rate-sensitive sector and here we are with notably higher interest rates.

It's also fair to say on the good news side of the ledger that some previous recession signals have unwound. We had been seeing a declining level of willingness to purchase durable goods.

That was a classic recession signal. We're starting to see that rise. It would be just about the first time it's ever risen without having a recession. But here we are with that metric starting to rebound.

We track recreational vehicle sales, RV sales, and historically, whenever you've had two consecutive years of decline, there's been a recession. We got those two years of decline.

We haven't seen a recession yet. We've now seen RV sales start to rebound. So there is a recession signal that just isn't clicking right now and has now turned. Similarly with inventory-to-sales ratios, we started to see inventory-to-sales ratios come back down. Previously when there was a spike, as we had seen recently, there's a recession.

We haven't had that recession. We're starting to see some improvement there.

Similarly, with profit margins in the U.S. stock market, when profit margins are falling significantly as they have over the last couple of years, that has always been a recession signal. We haven't gotten that recession yet. We're starting to see profit margins rebound slightly again.

So here we are again with just a set of traditional, in some cases historically failsafe, recession signals that just seemingly are now turning in the way that is pointing away from recession.

Similarly, some of the international data, Canadian GDP (gross domestic product) is looking a little better than expected for the fourth quarter, tracking 1.2% annualized. That’s not the 0% type of number that had been expected.

Eurozone GDP was zero in the fourth quarter, but the expectation was -0.1. That's perhaps a symbolic difference as opposed to a big difference, but just barely missing two quarters of consecutive decline.

Similarly in the UK, which is struggling, the composite Purchasing Managers Index is now up for a fourth straight month. It's sitting at a 52.9, which is well above the level of stagnation.

And so we are certainly seeing some good things. My net assessment would be the probability of a soft landing is continuing to rise. I do want to say, and this is just to confuse you all and really reflects the difficulty of forecasting accuracy right now,

It's not a slam dunk that we get a soft landing. We are still seeing things that argue for a hard landing. And you'd start with what I just said about the business cycle, which is 66% of the indicators are saying this is a pretty old cycle, one at risk of decline.

You know, theoretically, when you raise rates by five plus percentage points, there's supposed to be some economic pain somewhere.

It's hard to fathom there isn't going to be any suffering as a result of that. On that note, maybe we are seeing loan delinquency rates rising to some extent. So there are some issues beginning to be out there. Unclear how bad that becomes, but there is a bit of pain mounting.

We think some of the special things that particularly levitated the U.S. in 2023 are going to fade in 2024, including the degree of fiscal support and the level of consumer spending enthusiasm.

And we still do have lots of other recession signals that are still active, including things like inverted yield curves and shrinking global inflation-adjusted trade and falling U.S. temporary employment, and a Conference Board leading economic indicator that’s in pretty profound decline. And every time that's happened, there's been a recession.

So if you think you've heard me wrong, yes, I've said there are things that always happen and can generate a recession, and those are triggering things. There are also things triggering now that say there can't be a recession.

Obviously, both of those can't be right. So we're just getting a lot of contradiction right now. The uncertainty is higher than normal. There are two very conceivable outcomes for the economy. I think it would be misleading to suggest that one is a certainty and the other is an impossibility.

Okay, let's go from there. We'll talk about that number two I mentioned earlier.

Inflation is continuing to fall, although there’s certainly still work to be done. Still some risks, wage growth still too fast, among other things. But we are seeing progress and in particular, some pretty prominent inflation metrics are now in the twos. And so the PCE deflator in the U.S. is sitting at 2.6% year over year.

That is the Fed's favorite measure, purportedly. And the core PCE deflator is sitting at 2.9% for the first time, sub 3%. And so we're seeing some progress. To be sure there's still a big range of outcomes. And so median CPI is still running at 5.1% year over year. Some of the traditional CPI, core CPI is still a bit more than three.

So this is not a complete return to normality, but it is progress. When we look at three-month trends, a three-month annualized rate, we see even a little bit more progress. So those year-over-year numbers probably understate the improvement a little bit.

When we look at real-time metrics, they would suggest there is some scope for inflation coming down a bit further again.

The bottom line here is we are still slight optimists on inflation. We think there is some room for continued improvement. If we were to get a soft landing, it gets a little bit trickier because it's not clear the labor market cooperates and wage growth comes down, which might be necessary to get all the way back to normal.

So that does present a point of uncertainty. If you were to get a hard landing, it would be an easier journey down. But either way, we think there is room for some further improvement.

Okay, let's talk about China now. And so China in four acts. First, the economic situation is still quite weak for China. I would say, though, it's mainly a housing market story.

China is not in recession. China is still growing, albeit sluggishly. Really what's going on is the housing market there is very weak after having overinflated. It's big in and of itself, it's a big share of GDP, so a weak housing index, consumer spending, weak housing threatens lenders who have lent literally trillions of dollars to builders and in other capacities.

So we do have a below-consensus GDP forecast for China for this year of 4.3%. And we think there are some real issues, particularly in the housing space.

Let's turn to the second act, which is stimulus. From a stimulus perspective, we got a rate cut quite recently. We are getting some tentative fiscal stimulus. It's maybe a bit too much supply oriented, not enough demand oriented.

The issue is insufficient demand, not insufficient infrastructure and other things like that. There may be more coming in March, and we are beginning to see some stock market support for China. In fact, Chinese state-owned entities are now in the market buying in a big way, looking to stabilize the stock market there, which is I think a promising sign.

Act three is deflation. And so on the deflation side, China is in deflation. Chinese prices are falling outright. People are worried that China might export deflation to the rest of the world. I'm not that worried in part because I'm not convinced Chinese deflation sticks, and in part because of the rest of the world could use some deflationary pressures. Inflation is too high. That would be a welcome influence.

And in part because China exported deflation for decades, that was China making goods cheaper and cheaper and letting us buy more things and letting interest rates be lower and letting inflation be lower. And that doesn't sound like such a bad thing. So I'm not too, too worried about that.

I would just say the fact that China's in deflation says something about the weakness of the Chinese economy.

So it is indeed genuinely weak and more stimulus is needed.

The fourth act on China is demographics. China famously has a low fertility rate, but it's fallen even further in recent years. It's down to about 1.0. In other words, each generation you would expect to be half as big as the prior generation. And so that is pretty profound.

And there is a real scenario in which the Chinese population falls from 1.4 billion people today to just under 500 million by the end of the century. And so we're talking about practically a third of the current population, and that would leave it barely bigger than the U.S. at that juncture.

That's speculative. There may yet be things that change. But on the current trajectory, just given what we know even about fertility rates across Southeast Asia, it wouldn't seem unreasonable to expect that.

And that's highly relevant from a geopolitical perspective, from an economic growth perspective as well. And it's one of the very real headwinds that China faces, as much as China is still very much a global power player right now.

Okay. My last subject is educational attainment, specifically in the U.S., just flagging a trend that I think is a little bit counterintuitive, which is that we are seeing declining American educational attainment.

The percentage of the population with a college degree fell for the first time in 2022. The number of students enrolled in U.S. colleges has been falling slightly but steadily for a decade. At this point in time, the immediate college enrollment rate, meaning people going essentially straight from high school into college, fell from 70% in 2016 to 62% in 2021.

And so there is a genuine decline here. Some of that is due to the pandemic and fear of getting sick. A few years ago, we saw lower quality schooling during the pandemic and people didn't want to pay a lot of money for virtual schooling. So they just didn't end up going to the university. A strong job market pulled some people away. And so some are pandemic-related factors.

Those things might fade with time. Others, though, were more enduring, in particular just the cost of a college education, pricing people out altogether for those who can't afford it, making the return just less attractive, given how much more you might make with a college degree.

And so one way or the other, we've seen this decline in U.S. human capital and there was a risk to U.S. productivity growth if that were to continue, if the quality of human capital essentially keeps falling.

I would say we're still optimists on U.S. productivity.

We would say that the top end of U.S. society, the scientists, the entrepreneurs, the business people are still enormously impressive in a way that could just keep driving the economy forward, even if the average person is less educated. We would also say that just the scientific advancements occurring around the world are sufficiently exciting that there could still be fast productivity growth, even if the average American is less educated.

But the bottom line here is that it's not ideal that Americans are becoming less educated. That's a trend to watch going forward to see if it sticks.

Okay, I'll stop there and say thanks so much, as always, for your time. I hope you found this interesting and useful and please tune in again next time.

 

Pour en savoir plus, consultez le #MacroMemo

Déclarations

Ce support est fourni par RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs (RBC GMA) à titre indicatif seulement. Il ne peut être ni reproduit, ni distribué, ni publié sans le consentement écrit préalable de RBC GMA ou de ses entités affiliées mentionnées dans les présentes. Il ne constitue pas une offre d’achat ou de vente ou la sollicitation d’achat ou de vente de titres, de produits ou de services, et ce, dans tous les territoires. Il n’a pas non plus pour objectif de fournir des conseils financiers, juridiques, comptables, fiscaux, liés aux placements ou autres, et ne doit pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. Il ne peut pas être distribué aux investisseurs résidant dans les territoires où une telle distribution est interdite.

RBC GMA est la division de gestion d’actifs de Banque Royale du Canada (RBC) qui regroupe RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc. (RBC GMA), RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. (RBC GAM (US)), RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited (RBC GAM (UK)), RBC Global Asset Management (Asia) Limited (RBC GAM (Asia)) et RBC Gestion d’actifs Indigo Inc. (RBC Indigo), qui sont des filiales distinctes, mais affiliées de RBC.

Au Canada, ce support est fourni par RBC GMA (y compris par PH&N Institutionnel) ou par RBC Indigo, chacune étant régie par chaque commission provinciale ou territoriale des valeurs mobilières auprès de laquelle elle est inscrite. Aux États-Unis, il est fourni par RBC GAM (US), un conseiller en placement agréé par le gouvernement fédéral. En Europe, il est fourni par RBC GAM (UK), qui est agréée et régie par la Financial Conduct Authority du Royaume-Uni. En Asie, il est fourni par RBC GAM (Asia), qui est inscrite auprès de la Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) de Hong Kong.

Vous trouverez des informations complémentaires sur RBC GMA sur le site Web www.rbcgam.com.

Ce support n’a pas été revu par une autorité en valeurs mobilières ou toute autre autorité de réglementation et n’est inscrit auprès d’aucune d’entre elles. Il peut, s’il est approprié et permis de le faire, être distribué par les entités susmentionnées dans leur territoire respectif.

Tout renseignement prospectif sur les placements ou l’économie contenu dans ce support a été obtenu par RBC GMA auprès de plusieurs sources. Les renseignements obtenus de tiers sont jugés fiables, mais ni RBC GMA, ni ses sociétés affiliées, ni aucune autre personne n’en garantissent explicitement ou implicitement l’exactitude, l’intégralité ou la pertinence. RBC GMA et ses sociétés affiliées n’assument aucune responsabilité à l’égard des erreurs ou des omissions relatives à ces renseignements.

Les opinions contenues dans le présent support reflètent le jugement et le leadership éclairé de RBC GMA, et peuvent changer à tout moment. Elles sont données à titre indicatif seulement et ne visent pas à fournir des conseils financiers ou liés aux placements et ne doivent pas servir de fondement à de tels conseils. RBC GMA n’est pas tenue de mettre à jour ces opinions.

RBC GMA se réserve le droit, à tout moment et sans préavis, de corriger ou de modifier ces renseignements, ou de cesser de les publier.

Les rendements antérieurs ne sont pas garants des résultats futurs. Tout placement comporte un risque de perdre la totalité ou une partie du montant investi. Les rendements estimatifs indiqués, le cas échéant, sont présentés à titre indicatif seulement et ne constituent en aucun cas des prévisions. Les rendements réels pourraient être supérieurs ou inférieurs à ceux indiqués et pourraient varier considérablement, surtout à court terme. Il est impossible d’investir directement dans un indice.

Certains énoncés contenus dans ce support peuvent être considérés comme étant des énoncés prospectifs, lesquels expriment des attentes ou des prévisions actuelles à l’égard de résultats ou d’événements futurs. Les énoncés prospectifs ne sont pas des garanties de rendements ou d’événements futurs et comportent des risques et des incertitudes. Il convient de ne pas se fier indûment à ces énoncés, puisque les résultats ou les événements réels pourraient différer considérablement de ceux qui y sont indiqués en raison de divers facteurs. Avant de prendre une décision de placement, nous vous invitons à prendre en compte attentivement tous les facteurs pertinents.

®/MC Marque(s) de commerce de Banque Royale du Canada, utilisée sous licence.

© RBC Gestion mondiale d’actifs Inc., 2024